![]() This will aid in what CPU types are best for SolidWorks. To compare your score to other SolidWorks users go to:, the Share Your Score page will specify what graphics card and computer hardware was used. Additional tests can be run that will not be included in the overall score. The results from the test will categorize each of the tests ran into Graphics, Processor, and I/O to give an Overall Score. Simulation: Time required to run a study with varying factors that will act upon a model.SolidWorks requires an approved video graphics card before running the benchmark. The more complex your part is, the more difficult it becomes for us to evacuate unsintered powder from the interior when the part is taken out of the 3D printer. RealView Performance: Similar to Graphics but with RealView Graphics turned on.Rendering: Time it takes for a photo-realistic render of the test model to finish.The benchmark does not test for files on a network or PDM vault. ![]() I/O: Computers ability to save, open, and rebuild SolidWorks files on the local hard drive.However, it is one of the most used tools among gamers. A fast time means SolidWorks features will not take a long to execute. HWMonitor brands itself as a hardware monitoring solution rather than a benchmarking application. Processor: Computers ability to execute SolidWorks related functions.Graphics: Computers ability to pan, zoom, and rotate the model without lag.Another way to get to the benchmarking test is to search for SolidWorks RX in the windows start bar. To benchmark your computer, SolidWorks includes an application called SolidWorks Performance Test in the computer search icon at the bottom of your screen. The SolidWorks benchmark test can be done as needed here at Perception Engineering, we benchmark all of our laptops and workstations every six months to constantly improve our equipment and justify new purchases if performance starts to decrease.īefore setting up the benchmark test it is recommended to restart your computer and closeout every application as the results may be altered if there are background applications running. Benchmarking is an important system diagnostic as your computer’s SolidWorks performance can now be quantified and compared to other SolidWorks users. Please share comments, suggestions for improvements, and other ideas by opening an issue on this repo or submitting a pull request.Whether you’re just getting started with SolidWorks or have been using it for years, benchmarking your PC for SolidWorks is a tool used for preventative maintenance and repeatable equipment evaluations. We’re releasing with version 4 of this geometry and would like to work with the community of testers and creators to continue to refine and build upon both this test geometry and the test protocol, both for FDM and soon for SLA, SLS, and metal AM machines as well. We designed geometry to group non-interfering test features in the lower half of the print and places the riskier feature at the top of the print so that it doesn’t interfere with earlier test features. Performance of the product is compared to a set benchmark or standard, and changes are made accordingly to improve performance. Having discrete tests that each are calibrated to cause process failure, however, can become difficult to manage as the number of specialized tests grows, so having a consolidated geometry makes the process of testing a new 3D printer more manageable. Benchmark testing is used to validate whether a software product conforms to required performance standards as expected by the user. It’s important to create dedicated test features and to calibrate those features to guarantee at least partial process failure: causing failure allows you to confirm that you’ve actually reached the limits of a process, and provides something discrete to measure and compare as relevant variables are changed. While this geometry and protocol can reveal many different types of problems in a system, fixing the exposed problems is out of scope for this basic assessment protocol. The failures lead to the creation of witness features that can be used to assess the performance of the slicer, the extruder, and the motion system. The geometry we’ve developed tests how well a printer’s hardware and software are calibrated to a given material by stressing the system to the point of failure. (You can read more about why we undertook this initiative here.) The features composing this geometry are largely based off the collaboration between Andreas Bastian and Make Magazine to develop Make Magazine’s early 3D printer shootout benchmarking protocol. Using the Autodesk x Kickstarter FDM 3D Printer AssessmentĪutodesk and Kickstarter have developed a common standard that enables people to assess the performance of FDM 3D printers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |